More Carter-Baker commentary

Dissent from Richard Hasen in today's CSM. It captures much of what Hasen wrote on his blog, highlighting the positive features of the report but dissenting on the ID question. I don't think Hasen is opposed to an ID requirement, but thinks that the mechanics are problematic at this point. And by taking such a strong position on the ID, Hasen believes the commission will undermine its own effectiveness.

Dan Tokaji at OSU Law School has a similar take. Dan helpfully summarizes other commentary.

Finally, electionline.org's Doug Chapin gives a third summary of opinions (with a particularly nice list of newspaper editorials) in his weekly report (Sept 22 date).